Section 25 CPC
Divorce, maintenance, child custody, restitution of conjugal rights and other civil matrimonial matters between different states.
Expert legal help for filing and opposing transfer petitions before the Supreme Court under Section 25 CPC and Section 446 BNSS. We assist clients across India in matrimonial, maintenance, custody, 498A, domestic violence, and connected proceedings.
Explore Transfer Petition Law ↓A transfer petition is a formal legal application filed before the Supreme Court of India requesting transfer of a pending matrimonial case from a court in one state to a court in another state.
Divorce, maintenance, child custody, restitution of conjugal rights and other civil matrimonial matters between different states.
Criminal matrimonial matters including 498A, domestic violence and dowry-related proceedings.
Both husband and wife can file. Courts examine genuine inconvenience, practical hardship, balance of convenience, and the ends of justice.
A Supreme Court transfer petition is required only where the two courts are in different states. If both courts are within the same state, the appropriate remedy is before the concerned High Court under Section 24 CPC or Section 447 BNSS.
The widespread perception that only wives can file — or that the Supreme Court always favours the wife — is legally incorrect. Both spouses have an equal right to file a transfer petition.
A Division Bench allowed a husband's transfer petition after considering the husband's location in Noida, the wife's location in Gurugram, and a connected case already pending at Gurugram. The decision reinforced that transfer is not automatic in favour of one gender and must be decided on practical considerations.
The primary provision for civil matrimonial matters — including divorce, maintenance, custody and restitution of conjugal rights. It empowers the Supreme Court to transfer a case from one state to another.
Governs criminal case transfers, including 498A/BNS matters, domestic violence criminal proceedings and dowry cases.
Used in exceptional cases involving substantial questions of law of general public importance.
From 1 July 2024, criminal transfer petitions should cite Section 446 BNSS, not the repealed Section 406 CrPC. Prior transfer precedents under Section 406 CrPC continue to apply.
Wife residing with parents in another state with no independent means to travel.
Small children in custody making repeated travel a genuine hardship.
Connected cases pending in another state, making consolidation more efficient.
Genuine safety concerns, harassment or intimidation at the original forum.
Medical conditions preventing regular travel, supported by medical records.
Both parties and material witnesses residing near the proposed transferee court.
Balance of convenience clearly favouring the new location.
General inconvenience of travel without specific hardship.
Financial incapacity alone, where travel expenses can be directed to be paid by the other side.
Being a woman, by itself, without further hardship.
Territorial jurisdiction objections that should first be raised before the original court.
Filing only as a delay tactic after substantial proceedings have already taken place.
Cases where video conferencing adequately resolves only the interim attendance issue.
The Supreme Court rejected financial dependence and general hardship as sufficient by themselves, instead directing payment of travel and stay expenses.
The Court found no sufficient hardship where the petitioner had Canadian permanent residency, international travel capacity, and had already participated virtually.
Only an Advocate on Record can file matters before the Supreme Court. Your drafting counsel prepares the matter while the AOR manages filing and court appearance.
The petition includes the synopsis, list of dates and events, transfer petition with prayer clause, and supporting affidavit.
The AOR files the matter before the Supreme Court Registry. Registry defects must be removed before the case receives its final transfer petition number.
The matter is initially listed before a bench. The Court may issue notice, grant interim stay of the original proceedings, or dismiss the petition if no sufficient case is shown.
After notice, the respondent files a reply affidavit. The Court may refer the matter to mediation before hearing final arguments.
If transfer is allowed, certified copies are obtained and filed before the original and transferee courts for record transmission and continuation of proceedings.
Petition drafted, Registry defects removed, and case number assigned.
First hearing before the bench; notice may be issued and interim stay considered.
Respondent receives notice, engages counsel and files a response.
Mediation may be attempted. If unresolved, final arguments are heard.
Records move from the original court to the transferee court and proceedings resume from the same stage.
Where the respondent does not oppose, an order may be passed as early as 2–6 weeks from the preliminary hearing. Contested petitions involving mediation may take up to 12 months.
The Court considered both parties' locations and a connected case already pending at Gurugram, allowing transfer on balance-of-convenience grounds.
Demonstrates that in exceptional cases the Supreme Court can invoke Article 142 within transfer proceedings to grant complete matrimonial relief.
Transfer cannot be denied solely because video conferencing is technically available, especially in matrimonial proceedings requiring meaningful personal participation.
The Supreme Court clarified continuity between the old Section 406 CrPC and Section 446 BNSS.
The Santhani principle remains important: a transfer petition cannot be rejected merely because video conferencing is available.
Courts may use VC pragmatically for interim hearings and mentioning stages, but physical attendance, reconciliation efforts, evidence and overall hardship remain relevant in final transfer decisions.
Obtain a certified copy of the Supreme Court transfer order from the Registry.
The original court records the transfer order and sends the full case record to the transferee court.
The transferee court assigns a new case number. Proceedings continue from the exact stage where they stopped.
Where a transfer order was passed ex-parte without proper service, the respondent may seek recall after learning of the order.
Yes. Both husband and wife can file. The Court considers genuine hardship, balance of convenience, location of connected cases, and the ends of justice — not gender alone.
No. Stay must be specifically sought. Filing a transfer petition does not automatically suspend proceedings in the original court.
Inter-state transfers are sought before the Supreme Court. Transfers between courts within the same state are ordinarily sought before the concerned High Court.
Criminal matrimonial proceedings may be transferred under Section 446 BNSS, subject to the facts and jurisdictional requirements.
Contested matters typically take around 3–12 months. Uncontested matters may be resolved considerably faster.
No. The transferred matter continues from the same procedural stage at which it was pending before the original court.
In exceptional cases, the Supreme Court may invoke Article 142 to grant complete matrimonial relief, including dissolution of marriage.