Blog

What Is Remission of Sentence Under Section 432 CrPC? Everything You Need to Know

Remission of sentence under Section 432 CrPC explained with courtroom visuals, prison release concept, and Indian lawyer portrait
Written by Adv. Aman Chawla | Matrimonial Law Specialist | Delhi High Court & Supreme Court of India 8 Years Exclusive Practice in Family & Matrimonial Law | Jangpura, New Delhi
Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) empowers the government to remit — partially or fully — the sentence of a convicted prisoner. With the introduction of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, this provision is now renumbered as Section 473. Understanding this section is vital for lawyers, law students, prisoners, and their families.

What Is Remission of Sentence?

Remission of sentence refers to the act of reducing or cancelling the remaining portion of a sentence imposed on a convicted person, without altering the conviction itself. It is a discretionary power vested in the executive — typically the State or Central Government — and must be exercised in accordance with law.

It is distinct from pardon, commutation, or suspension of sentence, though all fall under the broader concept of executive clemency under Articles 72 and 161 of the Constitution of India.

Old Provision
Sec. 432

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) — Power to suspend or remit sentences

New Provision
Sec. 473

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) — Same power, renumbered

Key Provisions of Section 432 CrPC

Under Section 432, the appropriate government (State or Centre, depending on the offence) has the power to:

  • Suspend the execution of a sentence for a period
  • Remit the whole or any part of the punishment to which the person was sentenced
  • Grant remission with or without conditions
  • Cancel a previously granted remission if conditions are violated

What happens when remission is wrongly granted?

A critical legal issue arises when the government releases a detenu (prisoner) based on a wrong interpretation of its own order. Courts have held that in such situations, re-arrest is permissible — but only if it is done through due process.

Important Legal PrincipleIf a prisoner is released due to a mistaken interpretation of a remission order, and the government seeks to re-arrest them after realising the error, such re-arrest must be backed by a formal order cancelling the remission. Mere re-arrest without this process violates the fundamental rights of the individual.

Legality of Re-Arrest After Wrong Remission

The question of whether the government can re-arrest a person after incorrectly granting remission has been addressed by several High Courts. The settled legal position is:

  • There must be a corresponding order of cancellation of the remission before re-arrest
  • The detenu must be produced before a court for seeking remand
  • Re-arrest without cancellation order and court remand is illegal
  • Such illegal re-arrest violates Article 21 of the Constitution — the Right to Life and Personal Liberty

Landmark Case: Naseem Bibi v. The Principal Secretary, Govt. of A.P.

Naseem Bibi v. The Principal Secretary, Govt. of A.P.
2010 Cri.L.J. 4124 | 2010 (2) ALD (Cri) 189 | (2010) 3 ALT(Crl) 24 | 2009 LRC Online 799 (AP)

The court held that re-arrest of a detenu after release on wrong interpretation of a government order — without a cancellation of remission order and without producing the person before a court — is illegal and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Conditions for Valid Remission

For a remission order to be legally valid, it must satisfy the following:

  • It must come from the “appropriate government” as defined under CrPC/BNSS
  • It must be consistent with the judgment and order of the court
  • In certain cases (especially life imprisonment), prior consultation with the Presiding Judge is required under Section 432(2)
  • It must not be arbitrary or motivated by extraneous considerations

Remission vs. Other Forms of Clemency

Many people confuse remission with other legal remedies. Here is how they differ:

  • Remission — reduces the remaining portion of the sentence; conviction stands
  • Commutation — substitutes a lesser form of punishment (e.g., death → life imprisonment)
  • Suspension — temporarily postpones the execution of sentence
  • Pardon — wipes out the conviction entirely; granted by President/Governor only.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Section 432 CrPC in simple terms?

Section 432 CrPC (now Section 473 BNSS 2023) gives the State or Central Government the power to reduce or cancel a convicted person’s sentence. This is called remission. It does not erase the conviction — only the remaining punishment is reduced or removed.

Has Section 432 CrPC been repealed?
The CrPC has been replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. Section 432 is now Section 473 under the BNSS. The substance of the provision remains largely the same; only the section number has changed.
Can a prisoner be re-arrested if remission was given by mistake?
Yes, but the re-arrest must follow due process. The government must first pass a formal order cancelling the remission and then produce the person before a court for remand. Re-arrest without these steps has been held illegal and unconstitutional by the courts.
What fundamental right is violated by illegal re-arrest?

Illegal re-arrest — especially without a valid cancellation order and without court remand — violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. No person can be deprived of liberty except in accordance with procedure established by law.

Who has the power to grant remission under Section 432?
The power to remit a sentence lies with the “appropriate government” — which is the State Government if the offence was investigated and tried under state jurisdiction, and the Central Government if it involves central laws or if the offender is sentenced to imprisonment in a state other than where the offence was committed.
Is remission of sentence the same as pardon?
No. A pardon (granted under Article 72 by the President or Article 161 by the Governor) completely wipes out the conviction and sentence. Remission under Section 432/473 only reduces the remaining sentence — the conviction itself remains on record.
Can conditions be attached to a remission order?
Yes. The government may grant remission with or without conditions. If conditions are imposed and the released person fails to comply, the government can cancel the remission and the person may be required to serve the remaining sentence.
What is the significance of the Naseem Bibi case?
The Naseem Bibi case (2010) laid down a clear principle: when a prisoner is released due to a wrong interpretation of a government remission order, the government cannot simply re-arrest them. It must cancel the remission formally and bring the person before a court. Otherwise, the re-arrest is unconstitutional and violates Article 21.

Consult Adv. Aman Chawla, Matrimonial Law Specialist, practicing before the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court, and all Delhi District Courts. Available for urgent matters, outstation clients, and online consultations across India.

Call: +91-8076836899 | WhatsApp | Email: info@thematrimoniallawyers.com Office: O-11A Basement, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi – 110014

Written by Adv. Aman Chawla. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is fact-specific. Please consult a qualified lawyer before taking any legal action.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *